I read an article a while ago now and meant to do a blog straight away and alas the last day here I am! So I read an article in the guardian about how the government intends to bring in a National Health Service database of all our medical history. It is claimed that of course only people with special granted permission will have access but I’m still pretty dubious. Generally our medical records are only seen by those in our local doctors surgeries but if this data bade comes in private medical information could be potentially accessed by complete strangers at the other end of the country. There are now restrictions put in place to prevent people accessing our say police records or financial records. But I have heard of people who have found ways around these systems and accessed peoples private information with out there permission. Its fairly likely that some one somewhere will be able to work out how to get around the security. Is means that people could use our personal information to their advantage or even maybe against us? In the article Harry Cayton though generally for the idea of a data base admits that he is ‘as anxious as anyone that intimate medical information should not appear in the news of the world.’ Demonstrating that there are serious doubts. Along with the idea of a national database it would appear that I.D cards are inevitable. The I.D cards will be biometric which means that for identification or verification of some ones identity on the basis of physiological or behavioural characteristics. On each individuals card it will contain 52 pieces of personal information. Not only does this mean that we will have to carry around a significant amount of information around with us but we also have to pay almost £100 for the privilege. I think there it is likely that there will be a massive increase in identity theft, especially when the prototypes that are around for the I.D cards have already been hacked in to. It fills me with little confidence about how secure my private information is. Im not sure that there is actually a need for the depth of the identity cards in terms of how much will be stored upon the cards. Its not as if the state don’t already have a fairly good idea exactly what we are up to. For example if we book plane tickets to America and pay by credit card the authorities do a credit check to examine what we have been buying. Also if we give an email address they access our email accounts to find out what we have been sending. In the news today it has also been reported that from summer when British travellers enter America all ten of their finger prints will be taken and stored by intelligence services such as the F.BI along side the finger prints of criminals. And there will be no restrictions on international use. . For me this is just infringing upon the human rights of those of us who are innocent. I know that with the terrorist threat there is bound to be tighter security, but I’m just not sure that id cards and such like are the way forwards. It seems as if we have no control or right over what is essentially our own information. I just don’t know where this is going to stop. I also wonder how much longer it is before we become a literal big brother state and what Orwell predicted will become a reality. If only I had the answers and I would imagine it’s a case of only time that will tell.
-
media and technology
@ 2007-01-05 – 16:01:26
The music industry it could be said works in cycles. Different styles of music come in fashion, go out and come back again. A good example of this could be electro music. Electro music uses technology such as synthesizers and drum machines to create a completely different sound to any instrument that could be used. It was hugely popular in the 80’s and in recent months has enjoyed a resurgence in to the mainstream.. I went to Ibiza summer 2006, and the majority of the music in all the major clubs was electro, and it looks like its here to stay. Electro has also made it big in the mainstream hits include fedde le grand, put your hands up for Detroit, Bodyrox ft Luciana with yeah yeah, exceeder by mason and justice vs. simian- we are your friends.
Recently the music industry has been accused of no longer being original. There is rarely a music chart that does not contain some form of cover version. Often the cover versions totally change the original concept of the song for example making a dance version of what was originally a love or rock song. A good example is the pop group girls aloud performing the Kaiser chiefs I predict a riot. The song was intended to an indie crowd but now girls aloud have used this for their own meaning as it were. This could be said to be bricolage, in the sense that they have changed the context and made it their own. There has also been a trend for mixing two songs together to create a new song. too many DJs are well known for remixing songs together and regularly sell out gigs. They often use contrasting songs but somehow work when mixed together.
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DnBdHEjrFZI"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DnBdHEjrFZI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
In terms of technology and the music industry probably the biggest impact has been the rise of downloading music as oppose to the traditional buying cds. Today computers are fitted as standard with the technology that allows people to copy data from cds. The notion of copying music and exchanging data via the internet hit the pockets of the big wogs of the music industry hard. There was the famous lawsuit against napster that made downloading music without paying illegal. Though you now have to pay to download music it is still much cheaper than what CD’s cost and the music industry is still losing considerable amounts of money, and it is proving popular. In 2006 there was the first number 1 purely off downloads alone gnarls Barkley. Adding to the demise of cds was the introduction of portable mp3 players and ipods, they have completely revolutionised how and when people listen to music. Walking down any high street in the U.K you cannot fail to see someone listening to some form of music playing device.I would also like to just have a think about the myspace phenomenon and how it is allowing unsigned bands to get their music out there free of charge. This again is denting the monopoly the music industry once had upon artists. People can now directly access to artists pages listen to their music, sometimes add it you your personal myspace page or download it in to your music files. Artist that again a large following are then able to go to record companies and show them the number of friends/fans they have and this increases their chances of being signed greatly. Artists such as Lily Allen initially got a huge fan base from being active on myspace. (http://www.myspace.com/lilymusic) Its rare now to find a new artist/band that has not embraced the myspace revolution.
Music is a fast changing industry and the digital revolution it could be said is the fuel for this change.

